Pluralistic: Flickr to copyleft trolls: drop dead (01 Apr 2023)


Today's links


John Milton's 'Fall of Lucifer,' modified so that God's light emanating from heaven is coming out of the Flickr blue-and-red-balls logo.

Flickr to copyleft trolls: drop dead (permalink)

Today's a big day for users of Creative Commons images: Flickr has declared zero tolerance for copyleft trolls, predators who exploit a bug in out-of-date versions of the CC licenses in order to threaten good-faith users of CC images who make minor errors in the way they credit the images.

First things first: Flickr's new community guidelines prohibit copyleft trolling: "Failure to allow a good faith reuser the opportunity to correct errors is against the intent of the license and not in line with the values of our community, and can result in your account being removed."

https://www.flickr.com/help/guidelines

If you are targeted by a copyleft troll who demands that you pay them because of minor errors in your Creative Commons attribution, here's how to report them and get them kicked off Flickr forever:

https://www.flickrhelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/4404057906068-How-to-report-Community-Guidelines-violations

Now, some background. Early versions of the Creative Commons licenses have a bug, a clause that says that the permissions conferred by CC licenses "terminate automatically upon any breach" – that is, if you violate any term of the license, it ceases to be in effect:

https://doctorow.medium.com/a-bug-in-early-creative-commons-licenses-has-enabled-a-new-breed-of-superpredator-5f6360713299

Core to the CC licenses is the idea of attribution. When you use a Creative Commons image, you must name the creator and link to the original, and name the license and link to it. Many CC users don't understand this; they use an image and add something like "Image: Cory Doctorow/Creative Commons" with no links or specific licenses.

Under the pre-4.0 versions of the license, this can be construed as a "breach" which "terminates" the CC license. That's where the copyleft trolls come in.

Copyleft trolls post CC-licensed stock art and then wait for a naive person to make a minor attribution error, and then they pounce, sending a legal threat and a speculative invoice demanding hundreds or thousands of dollars, under the threat of a $150,000 statutory damages award.

This is deeply unethical conduct. As I wrote when I was targeted by one of these creeps:

If you put a CC license on your work, its explicit message is, “I want you to re-use this.” Not “I am a pedantic asshole with a fetish for well-formed attribution strings.” The point of CC is not to teach the world to write attribution strings: it is to facilitate sharing and re-use. If you are a good-faith user of CC licenses, then your response to an incorrect attribution string should be a request to correct it, not a threat to sue for $150,000 in statutory damages.

Unethical as this conduct is, it's also big business. One company, Pixsy, is responsible for a long-running shakedown campaign, working with scammy photographers to send out demand letters to unsuspecting Creative Commons users.

And many of those photographers rely on Flickr to bait their traps.

There's a reason for this. Flickr's early years were a period of enormous innovation. Flickr was the first mobile photo-sharing site, and it invented numerous community features that turned it into a thriving hub for photographers, amateur and professional alike. Flickr was also an interoperability pioneer, offering an API that let any user move their photos to a rival service – a tacit pledge to keep your business by being better than the rest, not by locking you in.

I know all this because I was an early advisor to Flickr, and because, in a weird way, I am partially responsible for Flickr. You see, before Flickr, I was carrying on a long-distance relationship from San Francisco with a woman in London, and we were both alpha testers for a social game called GameNeverending.

One day over breakfast with GNE's founder Stewart Butterfield, he asked me how things were going in my romantic life. I answered that things were great, but mentioned that my girlfriend and I were struggling to share the pictures we took in our daily lives with one another. Stewart said, "Well, there's a photo-sharing feature for GNE on the roadmap – why don't I bump it up and we'll see if other people use it, too?"

They did. In fact, the feature was so popular that within a few months, GNE relaunched as Flickr, jettisoning the game entirely and focusing on just that one feature. I stayed on the advisory, and one of the things I encouraged was the plan to roll out Creative Commons licenses for Flickr images – and I made sure everyone knew about it when Flickr became the first CC-enabled image site.

(I also married the woman I was carrying on that long-distance relationship with and today we have a 15 year old daughter!)

But after Flickr was sold to Yahoo, it joined Yahoo's haunted armada of Web 2.0 ghost-ships, tossed back and forth in the storms created by the dueling princelings of Yahoo's bloated management layer, who spent more time sabotaging one another than they did making anything anyone else wanted to use. Yahoo eventually sold off all of those holdings at fire-sale prices to Verizon, who neglected them still further.

An abandoned ship is easy picking for the rats that live in its bilges. Pixsy and its photographers actually became official Flickr partners, pitching themselves as a way for photographers who didn't want their images shared to hunt down infringers – even as they facilitated a revolting campaign of copyleft trolling that depended on Flickr as their base of operations.

The depravity of copyleft trolls is truly boundless. Take Marco Verch, a prolific copyleft troll who hosts nearly 47,000 photos on Flickr. Verch hires low-waged gig work photographers through platforms like Upwork to take photos, then harasses people who make minor attribution errors:

https://www.computerweekly.com/news/252488167/Automated-image-recognition-How-using-free-photos-on-the-internet-can-lead-to-lawsuits-and-fines

Verch boasts that his predation lets him work for four hours a week, leaving him with ample time to focus on his hobby, running. Verch is a truly prolific predator, and his attacks have made untold numbers of victims miserable – including the small Dutch charity that was forced to shut down after paying his ransom demand. Pixsy has been Verch's US counsel and filed dozens of suits on his behalf.

Back in 2021, I got hit by Pixsy on behalf of a photographer named Nenad Stojkovic, with a claim that I had failed to attribute his image correctly. The email threat was truly vicious, calculated to strike terror into the recipient's heart and prompt swift payment of $600, for using a freely licensed image whose market value had been set by its creator at $0.00.

There was just one problem: I hadn't flubbed the attribution string. I helped with the launch of Creative Commons. I was CC's first European director. What's more, I have decades of experience fighting bullies and trolls and I knew their threat was bullshit – no court would award them the damages they were seeking.

So I wrote about it, publishing the text of my correspondence with Pixsy's staff and management, and calling on Flickr to make changes to prevent their tools from being abused to victimize innocent people, like forcing users with CC 2.0-licensed images to relicense them as CC 4.0, which guarantees users the right to 30 days to fix attribution strings.

The reason I thought Flickr might take this in hand is that it is finally under decent, responsive leadership – since 2018, Flickr has been owned by Smugmug, a family-owned business that really cares about photographers and the open internet.

Flickr hasn't taken all of my suggestions yet – my understanding is that they are laboring under enormous technological debt thanks to years of neglect by Yahoo and Verizon, and even small changes require weeks of all-hands technological work.

But what they have done is modify their policies to create a de facto CC 4.0 environment for their users, by promising to terminate the accounts of any user who repeatedly threatens legal action over bad attribution strings without first offering a 30-day grace period.

Flickr's done more than that, actually. For one thing, they ditched Pixsy, severing their relationship with the company (Pixsy still lists them on its "partner" page). They also created the Flickr Foundation, a nonprofit devoted to providing long-term, responsible stewardship for their CC and public domain image respositories:

https://www.flickr.org/

For its part, Creative Commons published an excellent "Statement of Enforcement Principles" for its licenses that unequivocally rejected the way that Pixsy and other copyleft trolls abuse the bug in its older licenses:

https://creativecommons.org/license-enforcement/enforcement-principles/

In the months since I published my article detailing Pixsy's attempt to shake me down, two things happened. First, I got a legal threat from Kain Jones, Pixsy's CEO, who demanded that I get on the phone with him, the the alternative being "escalating things legally":

https://pluralistic.net/2022/02/13/an-open-letter-to-pixsy-ceo-kain-jones-who-keeps-sending-me-legal-threats/

Jones also falsely claimed that naming the employees who'd threatened me violated the GDPR, which is extremely on-brand for this whole mess. While I don't claim to be the world's greatest expert on GDPR, I did lobby in Brussels for it, and I do have German specialist lawyers on tap who are happy to explain that Jones's threat is absolute nonsense.

As I noted in my followup to Jones, he seems incapable of interacting with the public or his critics without making legal threats – and not just any legal threats, but legal threats that are grounded in an unhinged, and, in my opinion, deliberately deceptive theories of the law.

Pixsy continued to rattle its sabers for a while after this, tweeting that I'd made errors in my description of its business operations but declining to correct those records in response to my and others' requests for further detail. It is my opinion that Pixsy failed to correct the record because my accusations were and are substantively correct.

But even after I stopped hearing from Pixsy, I continued to hear from its victims. I routinely receive distraught emails from everyday people who thought they were doing the right thing by using Creative Commons-licensed images in their work, and who now face a remorseless onslaught of threats from Pixsy's team. Some of these people have been targeted on behalf of Nenad Stojkovic, just as I was.

These people beg me for advice – will Pixsy sue? Can they ignore Pixsy's demands? I give them my condolences and tell them that I can't promise them that a company as vindictive, greedy and morally bankrupt as Pixsy won't bring a lawsuit. Every time, I wish I could offer them more.

Well, now I can: if you are targeted by a copyleft troll for using a Flickr-hosted image, narc them the fuck out. Tell Flickr about them. Flickr no longer tolerates copyleft trolling, and they will terminate repeat offenders' accounts.

As I wrote this today, I went back and revisted Pixsy CEO Kain Jones's letter to me and I was struck again by its absolute rank hypocrisy, the sheer sociopathic lack of self-awareness it displays. Jones presides over an empire of bulk legal threats, carefully drafted to frighten blameless people into sending him money they can't afford and don't owe. In this correspondence, his company tells its victims that they are liable "regardless of knowledge or intent." Victims are told that correcting their error will not suffice, because it "does not resolve the period of unlicensed use."

And yet, in this letter, Jones calls on me to show understanding because "people occasionally make mistakes." He scolds me for my "vitriol" in my naming and shaming a senior executive who boasts on Pixsy's website of having "overseen over 140,000 cases" – that is, who sent these outrageous letters to more than one hundred and forty thousand people and organizations.

Unlike Kain Jones, I am a working artist. I make my living from the sale of my creative works, not from tricking people who've made innocent, trivial legal errors into sending me hundreds or thousands of dollars. Unlike Marco Verch, I don't pay anonymous randos small sums to create new works, slap my name on them, and then threaten blameless people in the name of defending artists' rights.

And I sometimes have to police my copyrights. The world is full of quick-buck scammers who rip off my work, including my Creative Commons-licensed works, often with the assistance of some of the world's largest corporations:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/07/25/can-you-hear-me-now/#acx-ripoff

These people are engaged in what Douglas Rushkoff calls "Going Meta." They don't do anything useful, but rather, they create a chokepoint between people who do useful things and people who want to pay for those things, and squatting there, collecting rent:

https://rushkoff.medium.com/going-meta-d42c6a09225e

This is the passive-income brainworm – a parasitic, end-stage capitalist hustle that cloaks itself in high-minded rhetoric even though it is the very lowest of bottom-feeders. Pixsy claims that it is primarily an artists' defense tool, but the company conspicuously refused to tell me what share of its income comes from real copyright defense, and what share comes from copyleft trolling.

Whenever I think back on Kain Jones and his outrageous legal threats to me – first the one that falsely claimed I had violated a Creative Commons license, and then the one that insinuated that calling him out broke the law – the thing that outrages me most is his assertion that he is a defender of artists' rights.

What an outrageous and grotesque claim that is. A man who presides over a powerful corporation that devotes its considerable energy to tormenting people who used Creative Commons licenses as they were intended to be used sends a legal threat to a working artist and he styles himself a champion of the arts? If I wrote that into one of my bestselling novels – which generate revenue by making people happy through artistic expression, and not by terrorizing people with deceptive and unethical legal threats – I'd be accused of absurd, overbroad parody.

Hey look at this (permalink)


A Wayback Machine banner.

This day in history (permalink)

#20yrsago American Bar Association wants “pirate” WiFi regulated http://craphound.com/Committee_703_Mid-Winter_Re.DOC

#20yrsago Email “bullying” favors bosses https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/2902777.stm

#20yrsago Fiction, interview and review online at Strange Horizons https://web.archive.org/web/20030402125015/http://www.strangehorizons.com/Contents.html

#20yrsago Margaret Atwood: America is selling itself out https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/letter-america-3/

#15yrsago Hackers publish thousands of copies of fingerprint of German Minister who promotes fingerprint biometrics https://www.wired.com/2008/03/hackers-publish/

#15yrsago Dangers of a giant national database — article from 1967 was eerily prescient https://web.archive.org/web/20080401215049/http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/31/the-national-data-center-and-personal-privacy/

#15yrsago Rudy Rucker’s science fiction webzine Flurb #5 is out https://web.archive.org/web/20080305030119/http://www.flurb.net/

#15yrsago Homeless people disguised as stranded tourists sleep on Heathrow’s benches https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,1729692,00.html
#15yrsago VCs sitting on giant piles of money that Internet startups don’t need https://www.wired.com/2008/03/bz-lonelyvc/

#15yrsago Declassified memo authorized US to torture “enemy combatants” https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/01/AR2008040102213.html

#10yrsago HOWTO turn a dead hard-drive into a cotton candy machine https://web.archive.org/web/20130402130715/http://micgadget.com/24223/turning-an-old-hard-disk-into-a-candy-floss-machine/

#10yrsago Nevada State Legislature poised to take regulation of Burning Man away from state and local cops https://burners.me/2013/03/30/the-man-vs-the-man-will-local-authorities-be-booted-from-burning-man/

#10yrsago TSA routinely violates own rules and the law to discriminate against people w/disabilities https://s.ai/tsa/

#5yrsago Dutch panic over infiltration of an apostate Scientology-alike into education and government https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-43584884

#5yrsago Under Armour: hackers stole the data of 150,000,000 Myfitnesspal users because of course they did https://www.reuters.com/article/us-under-armour-databreach/under-armour-says-150-million-myfitnesspal-accounts-breached-idUSKBN1H532W


Colophon (permalink)

Today's top sources:

Currently writing:

  • A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING

  • Picks and Shovels, a Martin Hench noir thriller about the heroic era of the PC. FIRST DRAFT COMPLETE, WAITING FOR EDITORIAL REVIEW

  • The Bezzle, a Martin Hench noir thriller novel about the prison-tech industry. FIRST DRAFT COMPLETE, WAITING FOR EDITORIAL REVIEW

  • Vigilant, Little Brother short story about remote invigilation. ON SUBMISSION

  • Moral Hazard, a short story for MIT Tech Review's 12 Tomorrows. FIRST DRAFT COMPLETE, ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION

  • Spill, a Little Brother short story about pipeline protests. ON SUBMISSION

Latest podcast: Red Team Blues https://craphound.com/news/2023/03/26/red-team-blues/

Upcoming appearances:

Recent appearances:

Latest books:

Upcoming books:

  • Red Team Blues: "A grabby, compulsive thriller that will leave you knowing more about how the world works than you did before." Tor Books, April 2023

  • The Internet Con: A nonfiction book about interoperability and Big Tech, Verso, September 2023

  • The Lost Cause: a post-Green New Deal eco-topian novel about truth and reconciliation with white nationalist militias, Tor Books, November 2023

This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.

How to get Pluralistic:

Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

Pluralistic.net

Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://pluralistic.net/plura-list

Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic

Medium (no ads, paywalled):

https://doctorow.medium.com/

(Latest Medium column: "Silicon Valley Noir: Red Team Blues and the Role of Bitterness in Technothrillers" https://pluralistic.net/2023/03/26/silicon-valley-noir/)

Twitter (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

https://twitter.com/doctorow

Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic

"When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla" -Joey "Accordion Guy" DeVilla

1 Comment