- Ostromizing democracy: To counter antidemocratic libertarians, we need an analytical assessment of group problem-solving.
- Hey look at this: Delights to delectate.
- This day in history: 2013, 2018, 2022
- Colophon: Recent publications, upcoming/recent appearances, current writing projects, current reading
Ostromizing democracy (permalink)
You know how "realist" has become a synonym for "asshole?" As in, "I'm not a racist, I'm just a 'race realist?'" That same "realism" is also used to discredit the idea of democracy itself, among a group of self-styled "libertarian elitists," who claim that social science proves that democracy doesn't work – and can't work.
You've likely encountered elements of this ideology in the wild. Perhaps you've heard about how our cognitive biases make us incapable of deliberating, that "reasoning was not designed to pursue the truth. Reasoning was designed by evolution to help us win arguments."
Or maybe you've heard that voters are "rationally ignorant," choosing not to become informed about politics because their vote doesn't have enough influence to justify the cognitive expenditure of figuring out how to cast it.
There's the "backfire effect," the idea that rational argument doesn't make us change our minds, but rather, drives us to double-down on our own cherished beliefs. As if that wasn't bad enough, there's the Asch effect, which says that we will change our minds based on pressure from the majority, even if we know they're wrong.
Finally, there's the fact that the public Just Doesn't Understand Economics. When you compare the views of the average person to the views of the average PhD economist, you find that the public sharply disagrees with such obvious truths as "we should only worry about how big the pie is, not how big my slice is!" These fools just can't understand that an economy where their boss gets richer and they get poorer is a good economy, so long as it's growing overall!
That's why noted "realist" Peter Thiel thinks women shouldn't be allowed to vote. Thiel says that mothers are apt to sideline the "science" of economics for the soppy, sentimental idea that children shouldn't starve to death and thus vote for politicians who are willing to tax rich people. Thus do we find ourselves on the road to serfdom:
Other realists go even further, suggesting that anyone who disagrees with orthodox (Chicago School) economists shouldn't be allowed to vote: "[a]nyone who opposes surge pricing should be disenfranchised. That’s how we should decide who decides in epistocracy."
Add it all up and you get the various "libertarian" cases for abolishing democracy. Some of these libertarian elitists want to replace democracy with markets, because "markets impose an effective 'user fee' for irrationality that is absent from democracy.
Others say we should limit voting to "Vulcans" who can pass a knowledge test about the views of neoclassical economists, and if this means that fewer Black people and women are eligible to vote because either condition is "negatively correlated" with familiarity with "politics," then so mote be it. After all, these groups are "much more likely than others to be mistaken about what they really need":
These arguments and some of their most gaping errors are rehearsed in an excellent Democracy Journal article by Henry Farrell, Hugo Mercier, and Melissa Schwartzberg (Mercier's research is often misinterpreted and misquoted by libertarian elitists to bolster their position):
The article is a companion piece to a new academic article in American Political Science Review, where the authors propose a new subdiscipline of political science, Analytical Democracy Theory:
What's "Analytical Democracy Theory?" It's the systematic study of when and how collective decision-making works, and when it goes wrong. Because the libertarian elitists aren't completely, utterly wrong – there are times when groups of people make bad decisions. From that crumb of truth, the libertarian elitists theorize an entire nihilistic cake in which self-governance is impossible and where we fools and sentimentalists must be subjugated to the will of our intellectual betters, for our own good.
This isn't the first time libertarian political scientists have pulled this trick. You've probably heard of the "Tragedy of the Commons," which claims to be a "realist" account of what happens when people try to share something – a park, a beach, a forest – without anyone owning it. According to the "tragedy," these commons are inevitably ruined by "rational" actors who know that if they don't overgraze, pollute or despoil, someone else will, so they might as well get there first.
The Tragedy of the Commons feels right, and we've all experienced some version of it – the messy kitchen at your office or student house-share, the litter in the park, etc. But the paper that brought us the idea of the Tragedy of the Commons, published in 1968 by Garrett Hardin in Science, was a hoax:
Hardin didn't just claim that some commons turned tragic – he claimed that the tragedy was inevitable, and, moreover, that every commons had experienced a tragedy. But Hardin made it all up. It wasn't true. What's more, Hardin – an ardent white nationalist – used his "realist's" account of the commons to justify colonization and genocide.
After all, if the people who lived in these colonized places didn't have property rights to keep their commons from tragifying, then those commons were already doomed. The colonizers who seized their lands and murdered the people they found there were actually saving the colonized from their own tragedies.
Hardin went on to pioneer the idea of "lifeboat ethics," a greased slide to mass-extermination of "inferior" people (Hardin was also a eugenicist) in order to save our planet from "overpopulation."
Hardin's flawed account of the commons is a sterling example of the problem with economism, the ideology that underpins neoclassical economics:
Economism was summed up in by Ely Devons, who quipped ""If economists wished to study the horse, they wouldn’t go and look at horses. They’d sit in their studies and say to themselves, ‘What would I do if I were a horse?’"
Hardin asked himself, "If I were reliant upon a commons, what would I do?" And, being a realist (that is, an asshole), Hardin decided that he would steal everything from the commons because that's what the other realists would do if he didn't get there first.
Hardin didn't go and look at a commons. But someone else did.
Elinor Ostrom won the Nobel for her work studying the properties of successful, durable commons. She went and looked at commons:
Ostom codified the circumstances, mechanisms and principles that distinguished successful commons from failed commons.
Analytical Democratic Theory proposes doing for democratic deliberation what Ostrom did for commons: to create an empirical account of the methods, arrangements, circumstances and systems that produce good group reasoning, and avoid the pitfalls that lead to bad group reasoning. The economists' term for this is microfoundations: the close study of interaction among individuals, which then produces a "macro" account of how to structure whole societies.
Here are some examples of how microfoundations can answer some very big questions:
- Backfire effects: The original backfire effect research was a fluke. It turns out that in most cases, people who are presented with well-sourced facts and good arguments change their minds – but not always.
- Rational ignorance: Contrary to the predictions of "rational ignorance" theory, people who care about specific issues become "issue publics" who are incredibly knowledgeable about it, and deeply investigate and respond to candidates' positions:
Rational ignorance is a mirage, caused by giving people questionnaires about politics in general, rather than the politics that affects them directly and personally.
- "Myside" bias: Even when people strongly identify with a group, they are capable of filtering out "erroneous messages" that come from that group if they get good, contradictory evidence:
- Majority bias: People are capable of rejecting the consensus of majorities, when the majority view is implausible, or when the majority is small, or when the majority is not perceived as benevolent. The Asch effect is "folklore": yes, people may say that they hold a majority view when they face social sanction for rejecting it, but that doesn't mean they've changed their minds:
Notwithstanding all this, democracy's cheerleaders have some major gaps in the evidence to support their own view. Analytical Democratic Theory needs to investigate the nuts-and-bolts of when deliberation works and when it fails, including the tradeoffs between:
- "social comfort and comfort in expressing dissent":
- "shared common ground and some measure of preexisting disagreement":
- "group size and the need to represent diversity":
- "pressures for conformity and concerns for epistemic reputation":
Realism is a demand dressed up as an observation. Realists like Margaret Thatcher insisted "there is no alternative" to neoliberalism, but what she meant was "stop trying to think of an alternative." Hardin didn't just claim that some commons turned tragic, he claimed that the tragedy of the commons was inevitable – that we shouldn't even bother trying to create public goods.
The Ostrom method – actually studying how something works, rather than asking yourself how it would work if everyone thought like you – is a powerful tonic to this, but it's not the only one. One of the things that makes science fiction so powerful is its ability to ask how a system would work under some different social arrangement.
It's a radical proposition. Don't just ask what the gadget does: ask who it does it for and who it does it to. That's the foundation of Luddism, which is smeared as a technophobic rejection of technology, but which was only ever a social rejection of the specific economic arrangements of that technology. Specifically, the Luddites rejected the idea that machines should be "so easy a child could use them" in order to kidnap children from orphanages and working them to death at those machines:
There are sf writers who are making enormous strides in imagining how deliberative tools could enable new democratic institutions. Ruthanna Emrys's stunning 2022 novel "A Half-Built Garden" is a tour-de-force:
I like to think that I make a small contribution here, too. My next novel, "The Lost Cause," is at root a tale of competing group decision-making methodologies, between post-Green New Deal repair collectives, seafaring anarcho-capitalist techno-solutionists, and terrorizing white nationalist militias (it's out in November):
Hey look at this (permalink)
- Colorado kills law that made it harder for cities to offer Internet service https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/05/colorado-kills-law-that-made-it-harder-for-cities-to-offer-internet-service/ (h/t Slashdot)
The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights has endorsed federated media and decentralized moderation as the only path for equitable social media https://achpr.au.int/index.php/en/news/press-releases/2023-05-04/joint-declaration-media-freedom-and-democracy (h/t Tim Engelhardt)
Clarence Thomas Had a Child in Private School. Harlan Crow Paid the Tuition https://www.propublica.org/article/clarence-thomas-harlan-crow-private-school-tuition-scotus
This day in history (permalink)
#10yrsago Dan Kaminsky on Bitcoin https://www.wired.com/2013/05/lets-cut-through-the-bitcoin-hype/
#5yrsago Western Illinois coroner will hold your family’s ashes hostage for $1,000, won’t produce a death certificate without payment https://apnews.com/article/illinois-north-america-us-news-il-state-wire-ap-top-news-3b91c0727e254a1ab88c9fe044636d8c
#5yrsago Wil Wheaton’s frank, brave speech about his depression and anxiety https://wilwheaton.net/2018/05/my-name-is-wil-wheaton-i-live-with-chronic-depression-and-i-am-not-ashamed/
#5yrsago Three artificial pancreases: a special trio of Catalog of Missing Devices entries https://memex.craphound.com/2018/05/04/three-artificial-pancreases-a-special-trio-of-catalog-of-missing-devices-entries/
#5yrsago Prominent AI researchers call the entire field “alchemy” https://www.science.org/content/article/ai-researchers-allege-machine-learning-alchemy
#5yrsago Scandal-haunted Scott Pruitt’s staffers are shopping dirt on Ryan Zinke to create a distraction https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/05/epa-leaks/559607/
#5yrsago Tech conferences are relocating from the USA to Canada to attract attendees and speakers who don’t want to come to Trump’s America https://financialpost.com/technology/tech-conferences-moving-north-as-trump-policies-turn-off-attendees
#1yrago The eye-glazing scam of Medicare drug plans https://pluralistic.net/2022/05/04/house-always-wins/#are-you-on-drugs
Today's top sources: John Naughton (https://memex.naughtons.org/).
- A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING
Picks and Shovels, a Martin Hench noir thriller about the heroic era of the PC. FIRST DRAFT COMPLETE, WAITING FOR EDITORIAL REVIEW
The Bezzle, a Martin Hench noir thriller novel about the prison-tech industry. FIRST DRAFT COMPLETE, WAITING FOR EDITORIAL REVIEW
Vigilant, Little Brother short story about remote invigilation. ON SUBMISSION
Moral Hazard, a short story for MIT Tech Review's 12 Tomorrows. FIRST DRAFT COMPLETE, ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION
Spill, a Little Brother short story about pipeline protests. ON SUBMISSION
Latest podcast: How To Make a Child-Safe TikTok https://craphound.com/news/2023/04/17/how-to-make-a-child-safe-tiktok/
- Red Team Blues at Books, Inc with Mitch Kapor (Mountain View), May 5
Bay Area Bookfest (Berkeley), May 6/7
Open Source Summit (Vancouver), May 10
Massy Books Red Team Blues event with Sean Cranbury (Vancouver), May 10
Wordfest (Calgary), May 11
Gaithersburg Book Festival, May 20
Public Knowledge Emerging Tech keynote (DC), May 22
WEPFest with Ron Diebert, Dave Bidini and Nancy Olivieri (Toronto), May 23
HowTheLightGetsIn (Hay), May 28
HowTheLightGetsIn (Hay), May 29
Red Team Blues event with Tim Harford (Oxford), May 29
Red Team Blues event with Christian Reilly (Nottingham), May 30
Red Team Blues event with Ian Forrester (Manchester), May 31
UCL Peter Kirstein Lecture, Jun 1 (London):
Cymera Festival, Jun 3 (Edinburgh)
Red Team Blues with Martha Lane Fox at the British Library, Jun 5 (London):
Re:publica keynote, Jun 7 (Berlin)
- Author Talk: Cory Doctorow and Annalee Newitz in Conversation/SFPL
The Next Chapter/CBC
Media Death Cult
- "Chokepoint Capitalism: How to Beat Big Tech, Tame Big Content, and Get Artists Paid, with Rebecca Giblin", on how to unrig the markets for creative labor, Beacon Press/Scribe 2022 https://chokepointcapitalism.com
"Attack Surface": The third Little Brother novel, a standalone technothriller for adults. The Washington Post called it "a political cyberthriller, vigorous, bold and savvy about the limits of revolution and resistance." Order signed, personalized copies from Dark Delicacies https://www.darkdel.com/store/p1840/Available_Now%3A_Attack_Surface.html
"How to Destroy Surveillance Capitalism": an anti-monopoly pamphlet analyzing the true harms of surveillance capitalism and proposing a solution. https://onezero.medium.com/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism-8135e6744d59 (print edition: https://bookshop.org/books/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism/9781736205907) (signed copies: https://www.darkdel.com/store/p2024/Available_Now%3A__How_to_Destroy_Surveillance_Capitalism.html)
"Little Brother/Homeland": A reissue omnibus edition with a new introduction by Edward Snowden: https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250774583; personalized/signed copies here: https://www.darkdel.com/store/p1750/July%3A__Little_Brother_%26_Homeland.html
"Poesy the Monster Slayer" a picture book about monsters, bedtime, gender, and kicking ass. Order here: https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781626723627. Get a personalized, signed copy here: https://www.darkdel.com/store/p2682/Corey_Doctorow%3A_Poesy_the_Monster_Slayer_HB.html#/.
- Red Team Blues: "A grabby, compulsive thriller that will leave you knowing more about how the world works than you did before." Tor Books, April 2023
The Internet Con: A nonfiction book about interoperability and Big Tech, Verso, September 2023
The Lost Cause: a post-Green New Deal eco-topian novel about truth and reconciliation with white nationalist militias, Tor Books, November 2023
This work – excluding any serialized fiction – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.
The excerpt from Red Team Blues in this edition is all rights reserved.
Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.
How to get Pluralistic:
Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):
Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):
Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):
Medium (no ads, paywalled):
(Latest Medium column: "Weak Institutions: It's not a fair fight" https://doctorow.medium.com/weak-institutions-a26a20927b27)
Twitter (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):
Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):
"When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla" -Joey "Accordion Guy" DeVilla