- Quantifying copyright reversion: The first-of-its-kind dataset of creators who took back their rights.
- This day in history: 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016, 2020
- Colophon: Recent publications, upcoming/recent appearances, current writing projects, current reading
Quantifying copyright reversion (permalink)
At its outset, American copyright provided for 14 years of exclusivity, renewable for another 14 years by the author, but – crucially – not by the publisher. This was a shrewd move by the US Framers, because it meant the publisher had to convince the author to file paperwork.
Most authors have very little bargaining leverage at the outset of their publishing deals, and even when the author's prior accomplishments afford them some bargaining power, a new book is, by definition, an unknown quantity, and the fair price for it is debatable.
Then (as now), the majority of works are no longer commercially viable after 14 years. But for authors of the minority of works that thrive over long terms, renewal is an opportunity to reopen publisher negotiations from a position of strength.
The author could say, "When I sold you this book, neither of us could say how it would fare, so you paid me a modest sum. 14 years later, it is earning for you, and if you wish to continue to enjoy exclusive rights to it, I demand that you share that bounty with me."
If the publisher demurred, the author could simply walk away from the negotiations. The book's copyright would not renew, other printers could produce their own editions at or near the marginal cost. The publisher would lose all, the author would be no worse off.
Some form of renewal endured in US copyright for many years, and even after it was abolished, US copyright retained a measure intended to address creators' unbalanced negotiating power with their investors (studios, labels, publishers, etc): Reversion.
Essentially, US copyright lets creators to claim back their rights after 35 years (depending on the work's age), even if their contracts are for longer terms. This right can't be contracted away, either: a clause that says "I won't ever revert my rights" is not enforceable.
Reversion could allow creators to renegotiate their deals, but it has other benefits. For scholarly authors – who must sign away all rights, for free, to publish in journals that charge fortunes for access – it's a chance to get those works into the public domain.
For authors, it's a partial answer to the conundrum of ebooks and print-on-demand, which have made contractual reversion obsolete (publishers historically gave your rights back when the book was out of print, but ebooks and PoDs are never out of print).
And for creators who were tricked into signing away their rights, it's a chance to get them back.
But for all that, reversion is woefully rare, because the process is so complex, uncertain and obscure.
For years, the Authors Alliance has provided tools for creators seeking to revert their works, but even with this assistance, the process is daunting.
Efforts to improve the system have been hampered by a huge data-void. The US Copyright Office's databases are woefully and infamously clunky, incomplete, out-of-date and under-resourced.
This is a crisis for all creators – if we want to sell our works, then having clear records of our claims on them is essential, first, so buyers can find us, and second, so we can prove that we have the right to sell.
The rights reversion data void hampers international efforts to improve copyright for creators, as in South Africa, where US entertainment cartels exploited the gap to sow fear, uncertainty and doubt in a bid to prevent South African authors from winning reversion rights.
Which is why "U.S. Copyright Termination Notices 1977-2020: Introducing New Datasets," published today, represents such a milestone. A group of Australian scholars present the first ever comprehensive data on US copyright reversions.
The authors – Joshua Yuvaraj, Rebecca Giblin, Daniel Russo-Batterham, Genevieve Grant – scraped all Copyright Office data pertaining to reversion, painstakingly processed it, and published it. Here's the data:
and here's the codebooks:
The paper is up on SSRN today, and has been accepted for publication in the prestigious Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. It's an eye-popping read, and it reveals the truly dismal state – and vital necessity – of reversion.
Few creators have managed to revert but the ones that have are fascinating. Stephen King is a leading reverter, as are George RR Martin, Nora Roberts and David Eddings. – successful authors who are able to claim back their works and seek new deals based on their track records.
A single YA author – Francine Pascal_ – accounts for nearly all the YA reversions, thanks to her reclaiming of all 305 of her Sweet Valley High novels (in kids' books, Ann Martin attains another high-water mark for reverting the Baby-Sitters Club books).
But the most fascinating entry is funk titan George Clinton, who pursued his former manager Nene Montes for years, claiming he'd forged Clinton's signature and defrauded him to steal the rights to most of Clinton's prodigious and profitable catalog.
Thanks to reversion, Clinton was able to finally settle all question of title without expensive litigation – he simply reverted 1,413 works.
These are just the preliminary findings from this landmark, open-access dataset. Other researchers are encouraged to mine it further.
For policy-makers and creators' advocates, this data finally puts a sound evidentially footing beneath the debate over reversion. US reversion does help creators, but it is badly hamstrung by needless complexity and poor record-keeping.
Improving reversion – simplifying it, or even making it automatic at 25 years – is a no-brainer if you want to improve creators' share of the bounty of their most successful works.
Not coincidentally, Giblin (one of the authors) and I collaborated on THE SHAKEDOWN, a forthcoming book on how copyright, labor, contracting, and antitrust reforms could actually improve the creators' share of the profits from their labor.
(Image: Shakespeare Documented)
This day in history (permalink)
#20yrsago Death of a Dot-Com https://web.archive.org/web/20010703095832/http://www.oreilly.com/news/deathofdotcom_0601.html
#15yrsago US copyright law in verse https://jergames.blogspot.com/2006/07/us-copyright-code-in-verse.html
#10yrsago Stross’s Rule 34: pervy technothriller about the future of policing https://memex.craphound.com/2011/07/06/strosss-rule-34-pervy-technothriller-about-the-future-of-policing/
#10yrsago Spanish anti-piracy execs busted for ripping off artists https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2011/07/police-raid-spanish-collecting-society-in-embezzlement-case/
#5yrsago Epipens have more than quintupled in price since 2004 https://www.statnews.com/2016/07/06/epipen-prices-allergies/
#5yrsago Unpleasant Design: design that bullies its users https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/unpleasant-design-hostile-urban-architecture/
#5yrsago After 7 years, UK’s Iraq War inquiry releases 2.6M word report damning Tony Blair and the invasion https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20171123123237/http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/
#5yrsago Brexit’s other shoe drops: austerity, deregulation, climate nihilism https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/04/disaster-capitalism-tory-right-brexit-roll-back-state
#5yrsago UK Tories want 10-year prison sentences for watching TV the wrong way https://torrentfreak.com/uk-bill-introduces-10-year-prison-sentence-for-online-pirates-160706/
#5yrsago UK Tory leadership race: “a sort of X Factor for choosing the antichrist” https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/05/tory-leadership-election-x-factor-choosing-antichrist-brexit-frankie-boyle
#5yrsago Man builds giant, discrete-component-based computer that can play Tetris http://www.megaprocessor.com/
#1yrago Video and transcript of my OII talk https://pluralistic.net/2020/07/06/polbathic/#oii
#1yrago Miami cop owns illegal mansion nightclub https://pluralistic.net/2020/07/06/polbathic/#airbnb-acab
#1yrago Europe's interop coalition https://pluralistic.net/2020/07/06/polbathic/#eu-comcom
Today's top sources:
- Spill, a Little Brother short story about pipeline protests. Yesterday's progress: 267 words (8692 words total).
A Little Brother short story about remote invigilation. PLANNING
A nonfiction book about excessive buyer-power in the arts, co-written with Rebecca Giblin, "The Shakedown." FINAL EDITS
A post-GND utopian novel, "The Lost Cause." FINISHED
A cyberpunk noir thriller novel, "Red Team Blues." FINISHED
Currently reading: Analogia by George Dyson.
Latest podcast: Inside The Clock Tower https://craphound.com/news/2021/06/21/inside-the-clock-tower/
- Launch for Neil Sharpson's When the Sparrow Falls (Mysterious Galaxy), Jul 10, https://www.mystgalaxy.com/sharpson71021
- The Bitcoin Podcast:
The Rent's Too Damned High, Macro n Cheese:
3D Printing Sci-Fi, 3DPOD:
- "Attack Surface": The third Little Brother novel, a standalone technothriller for adults. The Washington Post called it "a political cyberthriller, vigorous, bold and savvy about the limits of revolution and resistance." Order signed, personalized copies from Dark Delicacies https://www.darkdel.com/store/p1840/Available_Now%3A_Attack_Surface.html
"How to Destroy Surveillance Capitalism": an anti-monopoly pamphlet analyzing the true harms of surveillance capitalism and proposing a solution. https://onezero.medium.com/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism-8135e6744d59 (print edition: https://bookshop.org/books/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism/9781736205907) (signed copies: https://www.darkdel.com/store/p2024/Available_Now%3A__How_to_Destroy_Surveillance_Capitalism.html)
"Little Brother/Homeland": A reissue omnibus edition with a new introduction by Edward Snowden: https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250774583; personalized/signed copies here: https://www.darkdel.com/store/p1750/July%3A__Little_Brother_%26_Homeland.html
"Poesy the Monster Slayer" a picture book about monsters, bedtime, gender, and kicking ass. Order here: https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781626723627. Get a personalized, signed copy here: https://www.darkdel.com/store/p1562/_Poesy_the_Monster_Slayer.html.
- The Shakedown, with Rebecca Giblin, nonfiction/business/politics, Beacon Press 2022
This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.
Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.
How to get Pluralistic:
Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):
Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):
Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):
Medium (no ads, paywalled):
(Latest Medium column: "Self Publishing," about the consolidation in publishing and what to do about it, https://doctorow.medium.com/self-publishing-41800468bcfe)
Twitter (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):
Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):
"When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla" -Joey "Accordion Guy" DeVilla