âThe rule is, jam to-morrow and jam yesterdayâââbut never jam to-day.â
-The Red Queen, Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There (Lewis Carroll)
The new, surging antitrust movement has given hope to many who yearn to throw off the yoke of Big Tech. After all, the tech giantsâ dominance was attained through solidly illegal conduct, such as anti-competitive mergers and acquisitions, predatory pricing, and price-fixing. This produced conditions in which the companies were able to engage in more flagrant illegal conduct, including unambiguous, multi-billion-dollar acts of fraud.
Beyond âcompetition,â âefficiencyâ and âinnovation,â interop delivers self-determination.
Image from Theophilus Brownâs 1915 patent for a manure spreader (USP#1139482)
I am recuperating from hip-replacement surgery and while that often means I canât concentrate enough to work, it also means I have long, uninterrupted periods to carry on correspondence, such as the paragraphs below, from my overdue reply to a left-wing economist with whom Iâve been discussing the case for interoperability. In our previous round, my correspondent had suggested that interop wasnât necessarily good, and that even profitable interop could be bad for all of usâââdo we really need 50 nearly identical inks on Amazon that can all work with our printer? How can anyone make a âgoodâ choice in that environment? My response is below.