Pluralistic: To save the news, shatter ad-tech (25 May 2023)


Today's links

Continue reading "Pluralistic: To save the news, shatter ad-tech (25 May 2023)"

Pluralistic: How to save the news from Big Tech (18 May 2023)


Today's links

Continue reading "Pluralistic: How to save the news from Big Tech (18 May 2023)"

Pluralistic: Ireland's privacy regulator is a gamekeeper-turned-poacher (15 May 2023)


Today's links

Continue reading "Pluralistic: Ireland's privacy regulator is a gamekeeper-turned-poacher (15 May 2023)"

Pluralistic: How tech does regulatory capture; Part 2 of the Red Team Blues serial (18 Apr 2023)


Today's links

Continue reading "Pluralistic: How tech does regulatory capture; Part 2 of the Red Team Blues serial (18 Apr 2023)"

Pluralistic: Mass tech worker layoffs and the soft landing (21 Mar 2023)


Today's links

Continue reading "Pluralistic: Mass tech worker layoffs and the soft landing (21 Mar 2023)"

Normalize Dark Corners!

There’s Nothing Wrong With Rolling Your Own.

A dark, rainy city alleyway, the walls daubed with graffiti.
Franck Michel/CC BY 2.0

Whenever something terrible happens on the internet — a coordinated harassment campaign on one of the big social media platforms, say, or a criminal conspiracy to traffick in child sex abuse images or promote a scammy cryptocurrency — inevitably we learn that this all took place in one of the net’s “dark corners.”

Continue reading "Normalize Dark Corners!"

Yes, It’s Censorship

Stop picking that nit, it’ll never heal.

A man’s screaming, open mouth. The interior has been filled with a Matrix-style “code waterfall” effect.
conall/CC BY 2.0 (modified)

American political discourse is sticky. It gets all over the place and it’s damned hard to dislodge. People in handcuffs all over the world demand their Miranda rights, and people arguing about social media all over the world are prone to saying “it’s only censorship when the government does it.”

Continue reading "Yes, It’s Censorship"

How to Leave Dying Social Media Platforms

(without ditching your friends)

An imaginary dialog box from a future Facebook; the user is being asked whether they want to continue to follow a friend who has left Facebook and is now on a small, community-managed social media service.

Lazar: Tevye! Tevye, I’m on my way.

Tevye: Where are you going?

Lazar: Chicago, in America.

Tevye: Chicago, America? We are going to New York, America.

Lazar: We’ll be neighbors. My wife, Fruma Sarah, may she rest in peace, has a brother there.

Tevye: That’s nice.

Lazar: I hate him, but a relative is a relative.

Collective Action Inaction in Action

In the opening scenes of the 1971 film adaptation of Fiddler on the Roof, the narrator, Tevye, introduces us to his village of Anatevka, which is a pretty fraught place where people are unhappy and danger is on the horizon. Nearly three hours and (spoiler alert) innumerable indignities and terrors later, Tevye and his neighbors leave the village, all to go their separate ways.

Continue reading "How to Leave Dying Social Media Platforms"

Unspeakable

Big-Tech-as-cop vs. abolishing Big Tech

An abstract background; in the foreground are a collection of speech balloons of various sizes and shapes, each filled with the “Matrix Waterfall” graphic; in the center at the bottom of the frame are the “Three Wise Monkeys,” their faces replaced by the menacing, staring red eye of HAL9000 from 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Cryteria, CC BY 3.0 (modified)/Japanexperterna.se, CC BY 2.0, modified; EnEdC, CC BY-SA 3.0, modified

Since late 2000, EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) has made steady progress, and now, despite US Big Tech companies’ illegal lobbying, it has become a law.

Continue reading "Unspeakable"

The True Genius of Tech Leaders

Capital, Not Vision.

A humanoid figure standing to the fore of a TED stage; he wears Steve Jobs’s signature turtleneck and bluejeans, but he is also wearing clown shoes. His head has been replaced by a donkey’s head.
in pastel and lKlearchos Kapoutsis/CC BY 2.0 (modified); Ben Stanfield/CC BY-SA 2.0 (modified)

When it’s railroading time, you get railroads. “Innovation” is the intersection of collage and timing. For hundreds of years, people observed the action of a screw-press and the motion of a twirling maple-key, and invented the helicopter:

A woodcut engraving of a screw-press, a plus sign, an engraving of a spinning maple key, an equals sign, DaVinci’s drawing of a helicopter.

But of course, they didn’t invent the helicopter! No one invented the helicopter, until someone else had invented new lightweight alloys, as well as fossil fuel refining techniques, as well as internal combustion engines:

A woodcut engraving of a screw-press, a plus sign, an engraving of a spinning maple key, a plus sign, a carbon fiber molecule, a plus sign, an oil well, a plus sign, an internal combustion engine, an equals sign, DaVinci’s drawing of a helicopter.

Once all those factors were in place, lots of people independently invented the helicopter. Same goes for TV, radio, and many other inventions. When it’s railroading time, you get railroads. It takes some creativity to invent the railroad, but creativity is an abundant element in the human condition. Creativity doesn’t get you anything until other people have build the substrate for your invention.

What we take for singular vision is best understood as lucky timing. Receiving the patent for the radio doesn’t mean you and you alone could invent the radio — it means you lucked into being alive when all the underlying technologies were in place, and you beat everyone else with the ability to invent radio to the patent office by a minute or two.

The Good Timing Theory of Innovation explains a lot about the successes and failures of the heavily mythologized tech founders and the companies they run. It explains how Google could launch such as fantastic search-engine and then launch a string of failed products, from G+ to Google Video to Stadia. Google’s success stories (its ad-tech stack, its mobile platform, its collaborative office suite, its server-management tech, its video platform…) are all acquisitions.

Besides search, Google’s only had two other in-house successes: they made a great Hotmail clone (Gmail), and they got more than a billion people to use Google Photos (but only by bundling it with Android, a mobile operating system they bought from someone else).

Google didn’t invent its way to glory — it bought its way there.

Continue reading "The True Genius of Tech Leaders"